What Animals Mean in the Fiction of Modernity argues that nonhuman animals, and stories about them, have always been closely bound up with the conceptual and material work of modernity. In the first half of the book, Philip Armstrong examines the function of animals and animal representations in four classic narratives: Robinson Crusoe, Gulliveras Travels, Frankenstein and Moby-Dick. He then goes on to explore how these stories have been re-worked, in ways that reflect shifting social and environmental forces, by later novelists, including H.G. Wells, Upton Sinclair, D.H. Lawrence, Ernest Hemingway, Franz Kafka, Brigid Brophy, Bernard Malamud, Timothy Findley, Will Self, Margaret Atwood, Yann Martel and J.M. Coetzee. What Animals Mean in the Fiction of Modernity also introduces readers to new developments in the study of human-animal relations. It does so by attending both to the significance of animals to humans, and to animalsa own purposes or designs; to what animals mean to us, and to what they mean to do, and how they mean to live.The use of the rabbit to exemplify the fragility of human dominion is explicit in Wellsa#39; essay on a#39;Human Evolutiona#39;, in which an ... These moments recall the pen- and-ink sketch of a rabbit dissecting a man that Wells drew in a copy of his firstanbsp;...
|Title||:||What Animals Mean in the Fiction of Modernity|
|Author||:||Associate Professor of Comparative Studies Philip Armstrong, Philip Armstrong|
|Publisher||:||Routledge - 2008-02-19|