In the first Quarterly Essay of 2002 Mungo MacCallum provides a devastating account of the Howard government's treatment of the refugees as well as delineating the factors in Australian history which have worked towards prejudice and those which have worked against it; ranging from Calwell's postwar immigration policy to the recent revelations of beat-ups and distortions in the 2001 election campaign. This is a powerful account of how the government played on what was ultimately the race issue. In an essay which is, by terms, witty, dry and bitingly understated, Mungo MacCallum asks what epithets are appropriate for a prime minister who has brought us to this pass. He also raises the question of whether Australia's contemporary treatment of refugees has anything in common with the sane and decent policies that have characterised the better moments in our history. q... it will take a long time to recover from the campaign of hate and fear which was deemed to be necessary to return the Howard government in the first year of the new millennium.q aMungo Maccallum, Girt By Sea q... this most cold-eyed of one time Canberra chroniclers brings to this story all his wit and dryness and power of mind. It's a sad tale...though it is everywhere enlivened by [Mungo] MacCallum's... tendency to suggest that spades really are bloody shovels at the end of the day.q aPeter Craven, IntroductionTwo points should be made: firstly, the legal question of refugee status has nothing to do with money; it is a question of whether a ... policy; after all, our whole Business Immigration Program is based on luring as many wealthy go- getters as possible to our shores. ... There is a technical distinction between aquot; unlawfulaquot; (unauthorised) and aquot;illegalaquot; (against the law) but this didna#39;t matter to Howarda#39;s mob; theyanbsp;...
|Title||:||Quarterly Essay 5 Girt By Sea|
|Publisher||:||Black Inc. - 2002-03-01|