The Supreme Court decision in the University of Michigan case in 2003 ruled the university's admissions procedures unconstitutional, giving minorities an unfair advantage of acceptance. The ruling stated race may still be used in admissions decisions to achieve diversity, but that race could not be used to give applicants preferential treatment in the admissions process. Motivated by this case, a researcher, Juan Gilbert, developed a computer based clustering method to aid admissions committees in choosing diverse entering classes. This method was evaluated using undergraduate admissions data sets from two public universities. Gilbert's method suggested diverse entering classes but did not select well based on merit. A method of improvement is introduced that maintains the academic characteristics of the university through classification, while suggesting diverse entering classes more academically similar to those actually accepted.624), but the Asians applicants had a much higher SAT-Math than the Hispanic students. ... The essay score, School A a#39;s rater score of each studenta#39;s personal essay, shows that the Native Americans had the ... The White (35.9), Asian (35.7), and applicants with Unknown Races (35.9) had very similar average essay scores, while the Multiethnic applicants had the highest average essay scores ( 37.4).
|Title||:||Computing Diversity in Undergraduate Admissions Decisions|
|Publisher||:||ProQuest - 2009|