First Amendment defenders greeted the Court's Citizens United ruling with enthusiasm, while electoral reformers recoiled in disbelief. Robert Post offers a constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps, and he explains how the case might have been decided in a way that would preserve free speech and electoral integrity.The upshot of that work, as Post delicately suggests, is that the Courta#39;s conception of acorruptiona is confused. ... in this short essay is to argue that the smaller step is worth taking too, and is strongly supported by the approach Post takes to theanbsp;...
|Author||:||Robert C. Post|
|Publisher||:||Harvard University Press - 2014-06-23|