... SWIDA simply seemed willing to acquire whatever Gateway wanted.269 Third, the court stated that SWIDA, despite its public purpose claims to the contrary, simply acted as ... Myers, 216 the Arizona Court of Appeals ruled that of Chicago, 68 N.E. 522, 524 (111. 1902). aquot;The public must be to some extent entitled to use or enjoy the property, not as a mere favor or by permission of the owner, but by right.
|Title||:||Albany Law environmental outlook journal|
|Author||:||Albany Law School|